Requirement
- 8 pairs of images showing different contrasts in each pair
- 1 photograph that shows the contrast in one picture
Technical learning
- Johannes Itten of the Bauhaus developed modern theory of contrast in art, design and architecture in the 1920s
- This theory has translated easily into photography
- Itten set his students an exercise similar to this assignment, intending that they approach the task from 3 directions: experience the feeling of the contrast before seeing it as an image, decide how to communicate that feeling, produce an image that conveys this sensation.
- Some contrasts to consider:
Large/small
Many/few
Transparent/ opaque
Broad/ narrow
Diagonal/ rounded
|
Long/ short
Pointed/ blunt
Liquid/ solid
Light/ dark
Hard/ soft
|
Thick/ thin
Smooth/ rough
Strong/ weak
Much/ little
Light/ heavy
Continuous/ intermittent
|
Black/ white
Still/ moving
High/ low
Straight/curved
Sweet/ sour
|
Exercise instructions
Review own photos to assemble
pairs that represent different contrasts. Identify subjects that best
express extremes of different visual qualities – colour, tone, lighting,
comparative relationships between subject and background. Shoot 8 pairs of photographs
(either separately, or in one picture). Shoot 1 photograph that presents a contrast in a single image.
Images and Review
Images and Review
Tutor's feedback on the assignment- overall comments
Interesting and imaginative first assignment. Having dispensed with the suggested pairings you've made some of your own, in some cases quite advanced. However, there are a few too simple colour contrasts in the set: did you miss the point of the assignment?
Improve your presentation:
- mount your prints on white card
- make them at least A5 size rather than 4 x 6 inches
- give each print a title
- label each print with your name and student number
A. Contrast in one image
View of St Pauls Cathedral from One Change Alley
Old vs New architecture Stone vs Glass materials Spiritual vs Material Values Light vs Dark Curves vs Lines |
Contrast is strong. Composition works well - the eyes are drawn to the cathedral by both lines and the dark to light relationship and St Pauls stands out against a blue sky.
|
B. Pairs of contrasts
(1) Man and his dog on beach at Burnham-on-Sea vs rush hour on London Bridge
Peaceful and spacious |
Hectic and cramped |
Contrast is unconvincing. Difference here is between Near and Far, not really between Tranquillity and a Hectic Atmosphere. Perhaps consider another wide shot, horizontal format, with similar distance framing, but using a subject like traffic, or the same walkway (bridge?) but from a distance. Zooming in tends to create a sense of intimacy. And in fact, the man on the phone doesn’t look hectic at all, but seems quite relaxed.
(2) Flowers in Vivary Park, Taunton
Blue |
Pink |
Horizontal |
Vertical |
This depends too much on the way you orient the photos. Here you could have better photographed something less likely to be oriented either horizontally or vertically – for example, a vertical tree and a horizontal felled tree.
Blue seacape at dawn |
Green landscape at midday |
Colour |
Monochrome |
Excellent. Nice pairing, Great composition - great vantage point and use of foreground trees to frame. Perhaps remove white spots on print of colour shot?
(7) Bins
Nearly empty |
Over full |
This contrast doesn’t work because you haven’t set up a viable standard. If you take two identically framed shots of a dustbin, one full and one empty, the contrast in states is emphasized. But here you’ve changed viewpoint. The ‘full’ shot is just an edge, there is no sense of ‘fullness’ there.
(8) One logo vs another in adjoining shop windows, Soho
Red circle on white background |
White circle on red background |
Yes, good spot but too simplistic
No comments:
Post a Comment