Showing posts with label Assignment 1 - Contrasts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Assignment 1 - Contrasts. Show all posts

Thursday, 10 October 2013

Contrasts - final version of assignment #1

Decisions
My decisions for the final submission were:

General - all assignments
  • Submit my course material digitally (either by CD or by USB stick): the OCA student site signals strongly that digital presentation is now preferred for assessing course work at Levels 1 and 2 (without saying directly that students cannot submit physical prints, etc.)
  • Treat this assignment as if it going to be marked, even though the assessment guidance to students says that it isn't. Practice makes perfect - I am doing the course to improve as a photographer, not just to pass an exam.
  • Prepare all images ready for printing at 9 x 6 inches, , to increase consistency between each Assignment submitted for marking (the human mind prefers order and repetition unless departing from it is an essential part of the message)
This assignment
  • Keep the following images from the original submission: the single image with contrasts of St Paul's Cathedral (A1) and Monochrome v Colour (B5, now B1)
  • Change the description of 2 pairs of contrasts: Peaceful and spacious vs. Hectic and Cramped (B1, now B2) to Quiet vs. Busy, Red circle on white background and vice versa (B8, now B3) to Positive vs. Negative (yes, these are simple images but I like the contrast so am willing to take the consequences in the hands of when marked by the assessors!)
  • Switch the Country image for an alternative with a vertical frame (as opposed to a horizontal one) to improve the impact of the contrast in Country v City (B6, now B4)
  • Create 4 new pairs, all still lifes: B5 Few vs. Many, B6 Pointed vs. Round, B7 Curved vs. Straight and B8 Scruffy vs. Neat
Click here for: Original version of Assignment 1


Images for final submission


A. Contrast in a single image


Old vs. New
Stone vs. Glass
Light vs. Dark
God vs. Mammon
St Pauls Cathedral as seen through
New Change Alley Shopping Centre




B. Pairs of contrasts

 1. Colour vs. Monochrome

Colour
Dawn seen from Glastonbury Tor

Monochrome
Dawn seen from Glastonbury Tor

2. Quiet vs. Busy

Quiet
Man and his dog on the beach at
Burnham on Sea at low tide
 

Busy
Commuters at Canary Wharf

3. Positive vs. Negative

Positive
1 shop window in Soho
Negative
Adjacent shop window in Soho

4. Country vs. City

Country
Small barn on a Swiss farm

City
Office building, London Wall

5. Few vs. Many


Few
Make-up box




Many
Male-up box

6. Pointed vs. Rounded

Pointed
Pencils
Rounded
Make-up brush



7. Curved vs. Straight

Curved
Flexible ruler
Straight
Flexible Ruler


8. Scruffy vs. Tidy

Scruffy
Orange tissue paper
Tidy
Blue tissue paper











Monday, 31 October 2011

The Frame - Contrasts (Assignment 1)


Requirement
  • 8 pairs of images showing different contrasts in each pair
  • 1 photograph that shows the contrast in one picture


Technical learning
  • Johannes Itten of the Bauhaus developed modern theory of contrast in art, design and architecture in the 1920s
  • This theory has translated easily into photography
  • Itten set his students an exercise similar to this assignment, intending that they approach the task from 3 directions: experience the feeling of the contrast before seeing it as an image, decide how to communicate that feeling, produce an image that conveys this sensation.
  • Some contrasts to consider:
Large/small
Many/few
Transparent/ opaque
Broad/ narrow
Diagonal/ rounded

Long/ short
Pointed/ blunt
Liquid/ solid
Light/ dark
Hard/ soft
Thick/ thin
Smooth/ rough
Strong/ weak
Much/ little
Light/ heavy
Continuous/ intermittent
Black/ white
Still/ moving
High/ low
Straight/curved
Sweet/ sour
Exercise instructions
Review own photos to assemble pairs that represent different contrasts. Identify subjects that best express extremes of different visual qualities – colour, tone, lighting, comparative relationships between subject and background.  Shoot 8 pairs of photographs (either separately, or in one picture). Shoot 1 photograph that presents a contrast in a single image.




Images and Review



Tutor's feedback on the assignment- overall comments
Interesting and imaginative first assignment. Having dispensed with the suggested pairings you've made some of your own, in some cases quite advanced. However, there are a few too simple colour contrasts in the set: did you miss the point of the assignment?

Improve your presentation:

  • mount your prints on white card
  • make them at least A5 size rather than 4 x 6 inches
  • give each print a title
  • label each print with your name and student number


A. Contrast in one image 


View of St Pauls Cathedral from One Change Alley


Old vs New architecture
Stone vs Glass materials
Spiritual vs Material Values
Light vs Dark
Curves vs Lines

Contrast is strong. Composition works well - the eyes are drawn to the cathedral by both lines and the dark to light relationship and St Pauls stands out against a blue sky.



B. Pairs of contrasts


(1) Man and his dog on beach at Burnham-on-Sea vs rush hour on London Bridge

Peaceful and spacious
Hectic and cramped










 



Contrast is unconvincing.  Difference here is between Near and Far, not really between Tranquillity and a Hectic Atmosphere. Perhaps consider another wide shot, horizontal format, with similar distance framing, but using a subject like traffic, or the same walkway (bridge?) but from a distance. Zooming in tends to create a sense of intimacy. And in fact, the man on the phone doesn’t look hectic at all, but seems quite relaxed.






(2) Flowers in Vivary Park, Taunton

Blue
Pink




A bit more front lighting would have helped you get more detail out of the centres.



(3) Second hand popular novels stacked horizontally vs vertically

Horizontal
Vertical








 


This depends too much on the way you orient the photos. Here you could have better photographed something less likely to be oriented either horizontally or vertically – for example, a vertical tree and a horizontal felled tree.



(4) Sanxenxo bay vs Fields in Hirzel

Blue seacape at dawn
Green landscape at midday












More impact if you had used the same location, viewpoint with the same subject rather than changing subject. Could have improved the blue dawn photo with a wider angle to get more of the curved line of the cove in the shot. That line – as a graphic – stands out well in the blue light. 





(5) Dawn seen from Glastonbury Tor

Colour
Monochrome












Excellent. Nice pairing, Great composition - great vantage point and use of foreground trees to frame. Perhaps remove white spots on print of colour shot?



(6) A Swiss barn and One London Wall

Country
City











Good idea. Well composed - accented by blues and greens, 2 figures in City shot. However, contrast will improve if you keep the same orientations to avoid the impression that the images do not relate to each other (which unpicks the attempt at contrast)





(7) Bins

Nearly empty
Over full











This contrast doesn’t work because you haven’t set up a viable standard. If you take two identically framed shots of a dustbin, one full and one empty, the contrast in states is emphasized. But here you’ve changed viewpoint. The ‘full’ shot is just an edge, there is no sense of ‘fullness’ there.





(8) One logo vs another in adjoining shop windows, Soho

Red circle on white background
White circle on red background












Yes, good spot but too simplistic